Quasi-judicial officer’s error in judgment does not automatically imply misconduct or favouritism. In absence of allegations of extraneous influence, departmental proceedings should not be initiated merely because a quasi-judicial order was incorrect. The quasi-judicial officer’s error in judgment does not automatically imply misconduct or favouritism. Disciplinary action requires clear evidence of extraneous influence beyond mere legal mistakes to avoid undermining judicial independence. Wrong orders by judicial officers should not automatically lead to disciplinary action. Merely on the basis that a wrong order has been passed by the judicial officer or merely on the ground that the judicial order is incorrect, departmental proceedings should not be initiated. Departmental proceedings should also not be initiated when the order has been passed in good faith, without any indication of dishonesty,
When disciplinary actions will be taken against Quasi judicial officer:
- If there is prima facie material to show recklessness or misconduct in the discharge of his duty.
- If he/she had acted negligently or that he omitted the prescribed conditions which are essential for the exercise of the statutory powers.
- If he/she had acted in order to unduly favour a party.
- If he/she had been actuated by corrupt motive.
- If he/she had taken any form of gratification.
- If he/she had influenced by extraneous factors.
Each case depends on its facts, and absolute rules cannot be postulated.